- #NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT MAC OSX#
- #NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT INSTALL#
- #NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT UPGRADE#
- #NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT FULL#
- #NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT DOWNLOAD#
#NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT FULL#
We can go like this until we retire, we have a small warehouse full of compatible equipment.
#NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT UPGRADE#
We save the company millions because we don’t need to upgrade software. We usually sit around and repair boxen, train a few newbies every week. We have just a few master ghosts that if we need to image from, every machine is the same. And as a extra precaution almost all the ports are disconnected and there is no cd/floppy drives. We have 24,5 boxen running in my corporation alone, not one is connected to the outside world. That’s why they are still working and unaccounted for. Arguing that MS’s record on security has been good seems to me like an indefensible position.ĭuh, most Win 2000 boxes are vast amounts that are on internal LANs not having a browser what so ever installed, much less connected to the internet. It seems to me your basing your rebuttal on conjecture.Īnyway, I’ll keep to the record so far. In fact, all the Linux users I know were once Windows users (and some, like me, still are), and none of them run as root. Also, you don’t know that most Windows users would run as root. It’s not a moot argument, exactly because there isn’t an autorun in Linux, which improves safety (it pops a file manager window if it’s a data CD, or starts a media player if its a CD/DVD). And of course, you can’t make a file executable in Linux just by giving it the appropriate extension. Other distros make you create a separate user account during installation. In some distros, such as Ubuntu, there is no root user by default. You don’t know that they would in the same proportions, however. Those same people would run as root on linux and enter their passwords for every nude screen saver they ran accross on the net, causing their boxes to get root kitted just as fast as a windows box. I’m not being disingeneous, this is the current state of things. Notice I specifically said “less secure by default”, not “could not be made as secure”. It’s getting lame, compare equal settings, it’s possible to secure either linux or windows, calling windows insecure because lots of people don’t bother with the OS’s security features is disingenuous. “The question is, with Microsoft’s dismal security record, how can you be so confident that the next version will be secure?”īecause XP SP 2 is secure enough that I’ve seen no adware, spyware or viruses, and I’ve followed the developement of Vista so I know the new devotion to security MS devs have to security and that Vista will be even better in this regard. So it’s a moot argument, and it’s getting tiresome. Same would happen to linux if you had autorun on and ran as root like most windows users do and would in linux.
#NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT INSTALL#
“That’s not to mention that you can apparently install rootkits on a Windows XP PC simply by entering a Sony copy-protected CD…”
This is a double standard, linux users are assumed to use non-root accounts, whereas windows users are assumed to have admin accounts, and this is used as proof that windows is “teh insecure”, it’s getting lame, compare equal settings, it’s possible to secure either linux or windows, calling windows insecure because lots of people don’t bother with the OS’s security features is disingenuous. All the security concerns of XP are due to the user, the user chooses to run as root and run IMs as root, the OS allows you to run IMs with no system access. How do you quantify the assertion that it is less secure than linux or Mac? More stats from the ass of the anti-MSers. Recently, there’s been a rootkit being spread through an IM client!”
#NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT MAC OSX#
It is still a less secure OS than Linux or Mac OSX by default. “XP SP2 solved many security issues, but not all. That’s not the same thing as “no security”. What you mean is that it wasn’t secure enough to connect to the net with old versions without a firewall.
#NVIDIA GEFORCE FX 5200 DRIVER WINDOWS 7 32 BIT DOWNLOAD#
How long does it take for a Vanilla XP install to get hacked if you connect it to the net? Hint: it less than the time it takes for you to download the necessary security packages from the net…” “In any case, XP certainly didn’t have security when it came out. I didn’t correct myself ’cause I was afraid of saying something bad about MS I did so because every slightly exploitable thing said about windows is the subject of dozens of lame jokes and quips and I’m kinda tired of them so I don’t want to be the source of the next one through unfortunate wording. “Man, if you’re not a MS shill, stop acting like one! Are you that afraid of saying something bad against Windows that you must post corrections to your posts when you do?”
0 kommentar(er)
